Expression badge maker

The archived game below selects a preset fictional result. It is separate from the design tool above and cannot measure rarity, predict a future or reveal another person’s feelings.

About the archived wording: percentage, rarity, IQ, timed-performance and mind-reading claims in the original copy below are fictional challenge language, not measured findings. The rules and result labels are preserved for entertainment.

Deep in the keyboard, past the letters and the punctuation, every name has one emoji that fits it like a favorite jacket. Not a mood ring, not a horoscope, just a little pictured version of your particular energy.

Type your name and watch which twin steps forward. It might flatter you, it might roast you gently, and it will almost certainly end up as somebody's contact photo for you. Take it as lightly as it is meant. The best truths about us usually arrive wearing a joke.

A hundred and seventy-six pictures on a Japanese phone

The set most often treated as the beginning was drawn in 1999 by Shigetaka Kurita for NTT DoCoMo's i-mode mobile internet service: 176 pictograms, each twelve pixels square, covering weather, traffic, moods and a heart. The constraint did much of the design work, because at that size a face is a handful of dots and every symbol has to be legible at a glance. New York's Museum of Modern Art acquired the original set in 2016. Priority is contested, since rival Japanese carriers shipped pictogram sets of their own around the same period, and heart symbols on pagers came earlier still.

The word has nothing to do with emotion

Emoji is Japanese: e, meaning picture, and moji, meaning character. The resemblance to emoticon and emotion is a coincidence that has fooled almost everybody, including plenty of people who write about them for a living. The older emoticon, assembled out of punctuation marks, is a separate invention altogether and generally has to be read side-on.

How a new emoji actually gets made

Because each carrier's pictograms were mutually incompatible, engineers pushed for a shared encoding, and emoji entered the Unicode Standard in 2010. That turned them into text: characters with numbers behind them, sortable and searchable, rather than pictures pasted into a message. It also created a committee. Anyone may submit a proposal to the Unicode Consortium, but the case has to be argued, covering expected frequency of use, whether existing characters already do the job, and whether the image stays clear at small sizes. Logos, brands, named individuals and deities are excluded. A successful proposal still waits a couple of years to reach handsets.

The same face does not always arrive the same way

Vendors draw their own artwork, so a codepoint is an instruction rather than an image. Researchers comparing platforms have found people rating the same character quite differently depending on whose rendering they were shown, with one grin reading as pleased on one phone and pained on another while sender and receiver never learn they saw different faces. Composite characters make it odder still: families and many occupations are separate symbols stitched together by an invisible joining character, which is why they occasionally fall apart into their components on older software.

Expression badge maker